SOA abbreviation stands for service oriented architecture. Lets first define a service. In real world service is
what we pay for and we get the intended service. For instance you go to a hotel and order food. Your order first goes to
the counter and then it goes to the kitchen where the food is prepared and finally the waiter serves the food.
So in order to order a item from a hotel you need the three logical departments / services to work together (counter,
kitchen and waiter).
In the same manner in software world these services are termed as business services. They are self contained and logical.
So let’s first define a business service, SOA definition will be just an extension of the same.
Definition of business service: – It’s a logical encapsulation of self contained business functionality.
For instance figure ‘order system’ shows a simple ordering system which is achieved by different services like payment gateway, stock system and delivery system coming together. All the services are self contained and logical. They are like black boxes. In short we do not need to understand the internal details of how the business service works. For the external world it’s just a black box which takes messages and serves accordingly. For instance the ‘payment gateway’ business service takes message ‘check credit’ and gives out output does the customer have credit or not. For the ‘order system’ business service ‘payment gateway’ service is a black box.
Now let’s revise some bullet points of SOA before we arrive to a definition of SOA.
• SOA components are loosely coupled.
When we say loosely coupled means every service is self contained and exist in alone logically. For instance we take the ‘payment gateway’ service and attach it to a different system.
• SOA services are black boxes.
In SOA services hide there inner complexities. They only interact using messages and send services depending on those messages. By visualizing services as black boxes services become more loosely coupled.
• SOA service should be self defined:
– SOA services should be able to define themselves.
• SOA Services are maintained in a listing: – SOA services are maintained in a central repository. Applications can search the services in the central repository and use them accordingly.
• SOA components can be orchestrated and linked to achieve a particular functionality.
SOA services can be used/orchestrated in a plug and play manner. For instance figure ‘Orchestration’ shows two services ‘Security service’ and ‘Order processing service’. You can achieve two types of orchestrations from it one you can check the user first and then process order or vice-versa. Yes you guessed right using SOA we can manage work flow between services in a loosely coupled fashion.
SOA is a architecture for building business applications using loosely coupled services which act like black boxes and can be orchestrated to achieve a specific functionality by linking together.
No. If you need to integrate or make an existing system as a business service, you just need to create loosely coupled wrappers which will wrap your custom systems and expose the systems functionality in generic fashion to the external world.
SOA we can divide any architecture in two layers. The first which has direct relevance to business as it carries out business functions. The second layer is a technical layer which talks about managing computer resources like database, web server etc. This division is needed to identify a service. Consider the figure ‘Simple order system’. It has various components which interact with each other to complete the order system functionality.
The simple order system can be divided in to two layers (see figure ‘business and plumbing layer’ one which is business related and second which is more technical related. You can see the plumbing layer consisting of data access layer , AJAX , yes more of technical stuff.
Services are logical grouping of components to achieve business functionality. Components are implementation approaches to make a service. The components can be in JAVA, C#, C++ but the services will be exposed in a general format like Web Services.
Figure ‘Architecture of SOA’ shows a complete view of a SOA. Please note this architecture diagram is not tied up with implementation of Microsoft, IBM etc. It’s a general architecture. Any vendor who implements SOA needs to fulfill the below SOA components. How they do it is completely their own technological implementation.
The main goal of SOA is to connect disparate systems. In order that these disparate system work they should messages to each other. ESB (Enterprise service bus) acts like a reliable post office which guarantees delivery of messages between systems in a loosely coupled manner. ESB is a special layer which delivers messages between applications. In the figure we have shown a huge plump pipe. It’s not hardware or some wire etc. It’s a group of components/software which helps you to send and receive messages between the disparate applications. Do not try to code your own ESB, you can think of buying one from Microsoft, IBM, Oracle, progress etc.
SOA registry is like a reference database of services. It describes what each services do, where are they located and how can they communicate. It’s a central reference of meta-data for services.
SOA workflow allows us to define work flow using the services in SOA registry. We will read more about BPM in the further questions.
Service broker reads the work flow and takes services from the SOA registry and ties them together. Service brokers are normally middleware like EAI (Enterprise application Integration) products. You can get a list of decent EAI from Sun, Microsoft, and IBM etc.
Process manager is nothing but the collection of SOA registry, SOA workflow and service broker.
SOA supervisor is traffic cop ensuring that services do not have issues. It deals mainly with performance issues of the system so that appropriate service levels are met. If any of the services have performance problems it sends messages to the proper infrastructure to fix the issue.
Note: – The above explanation is of general architecture for SOA. Any vendor (Microsoft, IBM, SUN etc) who gives solution for SOA should have the above components in some or other manner. As this is a Software architecture book, we will not be covering specific vendor implementation. We would advise the reader to map the same to their vendor products for better understanding.
These three terminologies on which SOA service stands. Every service must expose one or more ends by which the service can be available to the client. End consists of three important things where, what and how:-
• Contract (What)
Contract is an agreement between two or more parties. It defines the protocol how client should communicate with your service. Technically, it describes parameters and return values for a method.
• Address (Where)
An Address indicates where we can find this service. Address is a URL, which points to the location of the service.
• Binding (How)
Bindings determine how this end can be accessed. It determines how communications is done. For instance, you expose your service, which can be accessed using SOAP over HTTP or BINARY over TCP. So for each of these communications medium two bindings will be created.
SOA is a thinking, it’s an architectural concept and web service is one of the technical approach to complete it. Web services are the preferred standards to achieve SOA.
• In SOA we need the services to be loosely coupled. A web service communicates using SOAP protocol which is XML based which is very loosely coupled. It answers the what part of the service.
• SOA services should be able to describe themselves.WSDL describes how we can access the service.
• SOA services are located in a directory.UDDI describes where we can get the web service. This nothing but implementation of SOA registry.